1.Ask him if he has a license to practice medicine! He has to show it to you. Ask to see his diplomas and his involvement in medical education. If this is a medical facility that wants its employees to be vaccinated, then move on to the second point.
2.Ask how come he wants to prescribe drug to a patient without seeing him. Ask him if he is sure he is not a charlatan. Where in medical practice is a doctor allowed to prescribe a drug without even seeing the patient!
3.Ask him to reveal to you the contents of these drugs, along with their side effects! This disclosure must be fully 100% together with the accompanying documentation establishing that the preparation is safe in order to alleviate the mandatory requirement!
What will happen next? Do you see? Be patient and you will find out!
They are going to tell you that there is a state of emergency created by the “pandemic”. At this point, you will need to have a lawyer or para-legal to form some important statements, because you are most likely to file a lawsuit (as Plaintiff) against the company or institution (as Defendant) for attempting to deprive you of your given by constitution and by God rights! It would be good for this argument to go to court, because there things cannot be hidden and the Defendant will be FORCED to TELL THE TRUTH. This is not so much an individual lawsuit, but rather a Class Action Lawsuit. The court may also issue an order suspending the compulsory vaccination by a claim filed by the plaintiff BEFORE or WHILE the trial lasts!
It is very important to understand the idea of “burden of proof”. In short, the one who claims something in court has the burden of establishing that these are true statements. This is a standard trick in jurisprudence that will force criminals to prove the truth of their allegations in court. Of course, they will not be able to, because everything is based on a long-tailed lie! To overcome the herd feeling of porn fear and to act systematically, without emotions!
We hope you understand that you cannot appear in court with some statements how bad are the things, because this automatically shifts the burden of proof to you, and you have to establish the allegations in the file. The opposite side can easily prevail!
The other important term in court proceedings is “first-hand witness”. You cannot present articles from the press in court, because this is a second- and third-hand testimony and has no probative value! The same goes for “hearsay” that will be thrown out the window right away! The fact that some other country has isolated the virus does not allow our government to declare a pandemic, lockdowns, masks, mandatory vaccinations. Such an isolate must be actually made in our country in order to have strength. So the isolate is another clue to use in court against the criminal leadership.
So, going to court, you are NOT trying to deny that there is no virus, because you automatically become an anti-vaxxer, you transfer the burden of proof on you, and thus deprive yourself of the possibility of court victory! All you have to do is ask the question: “is there such a thing, please prove it”!
An example of a first-hand witness would be a bio-lab in our country who, for example, would examine a vial of Moderna and find, for example, graphene oxide inside.
So what wording should be put in a lawsuit? All of these scoring points can be relocated. Here we give you an idea in general terms.
4.Ask the defendant to prove that the so-called SARS-Cov-2 virus exists. Ask for this to be conclusive and not indirect proof. For large measures such as “mandatory vaccinations”, there must be relevant “out-of-doubt and conclusive evidence”. Do not make any statements in a negative or positive sense. Let your lawyer run everything. You just answer the questions.
5.Ask the defendant to present an (act) decree or some other document (such as rules or regulations of the company or institution) that gives him the power to declare mandatory vaccinations or similar in his territory, business, place or field of activity. Ask the defendant to establish whether the submitted documents are not against the constitution! When it comes to such fundamental things, no institution or business can do anything without your participation and consent. A simple notification in the form of an order from the director of the company is not enough and there is simply no executive effect! This implies that the issue will be addressed with DILIGENCE and assessing of the “pros” and “cons”. These orders, which we saw a few days ago, lack exactly that – diligence, and awareness too! They show complete disregard for human rights! How come just one CEO would decide things that concern your health and that of your children! Practically they are finished so far.
6.Ask the defendant to prove that he is not acting, conspiring with another country (ies) or foreign organization (s) in order to deprive ordinary people of their basic rights under the disguise of “pandemic”.
7.Ask the defendant to prove that the ‘pandemic’ exists as such. Ask the defendant to prove that it is from the virus above and not from seasonal flu (compared to disease and mortality), not from 5G or a similar energy (invisible to the eye) weapons, that it is not spread by an airplane or other airborne means (chemtrails, aerosols). Again, “conclusive evidence” must be provided for high requirements. They just can’t!
8.Ask the defendant to prove that the masks adequately protect against viruses. Doesn’t the defendant remember from the virology course that the virus can penetrate the eyes, the skin, the ears? Where is our spacesuit? Is the defendant sure that the masks are safe? Especially for babies, children and people under 18?
9.This is the point 3 above. Again, ask for “conclusive proof” of safety.
10.PCR tests. Ask the defendant to prove that each test used is safe and effective. He won’t be able to do it, of course! Ask the defendant to declare that he will not use the tests as a means of segregation and discrimination in any respect (eg vaccination passports). Ask the defendant to declare (or at least to be in knowledge) that if he tries to do so, he falls under the penal code for abuse of power!
We do not give you legal advice, only information! Find a licensed lawyer or professional to help you specifically!
